Between 125,000 and 10,000 years ago, during the Late Pleistocene epoch, the Americas were home to the fierce predator known as the dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus). Dire wolves were bigger and stronger than modern gray wolves, with strong jaws and limbs that allowed them to pursue large animals like horses and bison. Dire wolves were among the most prevalent large animals in that area at the time, according to fossil data, especially from the La Brea Tar Pits in California.
Texas-based biotechnology startup Colasant Biosciences reported a major de-extinction science milestone in April 2025. The company found important genetic variations between dire wolves and their closest living relative, gray wolves by removing and sequencing DNA from ancient dire wolf remains—a 13,000-year-old tooth and a 72,000-year-old skull. They changed gray wolf embryos to display specific dire wolf features by use of cutting-edge gene-editing technologies Three pups called Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi sprang from these embryos placed into domestic dog surrogates.
These puppies are not really dire wolves, even if they have some physical traits typical of dire wolves, such more size and muscularity. Experts stress that rather becoming precise duplicates of the ancient species, these animals are genetically altered gray wolves with chosen dire wolf qualities.
Unlike efforts at genetic engineering, the 1988-started Dire Wolf Project seeks to replicate the look and behavior of the dire wolf via selective breeding of household canines. The experiment created the American Alsatian by crossbreeding breeds like the Alaskan Malamute, German Shepherd, and English Mastiff. These canines are kept in a mild and friendly manner fit for households, however their size and look reflect those of dire wolves.
Whether by selective breeding or genetic engineering, the rebirth of extinct species begs several ethical and environmental issues. Issues include the wellbeing of surrogate animals employed in cloning techniques, the ecological impact of reintroducing species into contemporary habitats, and the authenticity of generated species. Although de-extinction is becoming more possible because to technical developments, ethicists and scientists warn of careful thought on the wider consequences of reviving extinct species.